Skip to Content

The Formation and Origin of Rocked Planets

Terrestrial and habitable planets are both known as rocky planets. The formation and origin of rocky planets are also discussed. Read on to learn more about these planets. If you are interested in exploring the science behind them, you should begin by reading this article. It will teach you all about their formation, evolution, and history. It is likely that the planet you’re interested in has a rocky surface.

Terrestrial planets

The four innermost planets of the Solar System, Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars, are rocky and largely solid. The term “terrestrial planet” is from ancient Greek, which means “of earth.” Gas giants, on the other hand, are gas-filled, and their atmospheres engulf their tiny rocky cores. Therefore, the name “terrestrial planet” is used to describe any planet that has a solid surface, albeit a thin one.

The density of a rocky planet will decrease with increasing distance from the Sun. This is the case with Galilean satellites orbiting Jupiter, but not with the icy satellites of Saturn and Uranus. Eris, for example, has a density of 2.43+0.05 g*cm-3, indicating that its mass is mostly rocky with some surface ice. In the process, it is possible for terrestrial planets to contain a mix of metal and ice.

The largest opportunity for exploration lies with terrestrial planets. Unlike gas giants, terrestrial planets are rocky and give space agencies the ability to land their craft on their surface. Landers have explored the moon, Mars, and Venus. Only Venus’ atmosphere destroyed its surface craft. Gas giants, on the other hand, have no surface to explore. They are largely explored with orbital probes. In 2003, NASA crashed its Galileo probe into Jupiter’s atmosphere and in 2005, the Huygens mission landed a craft on Saturn’s moon Titan.

Habitable planets

Rock-covered exoplanets are the most accessible to study. Most of these planets orbit red dwarf stars, which emit high levels of UV radiation. This high energy suggests that life would have a difficult time forming on such planets. In contrast, planets orbiting other stars, including Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and the outer planets of the Solar System, are more likely to support life.

Astronomers have found 49 planets that exhibit rocky characteristics and have radii slightly smaller than Earth. The rocky planets that have been found by Kepler are located within a “habitable zone” – the area surrounding a star where the surface is likely to support liquid water. Among these planets, 20 are best candidates for being habitable. But the list could still grow as astronomers continue to uncover planets that may not have liquid water.

Another important planetary property is size. Until now, researchers have had trouble finding planets with suitable sizes. The transition from rocky planets to planets rich in volatiles occurs between the Earth and Neptune. For instance, planets between Earth and Neptune might be habitable, but not because they are large enough. It could be that the stars that orbit them emit lower temperatures than Sunlike planets. In that case, water would remain liquid.

Origin of rocky planets

The formation of rocky planets is still a mystery. However, recent discoveries have shattered the classical scenario of planet formation, which describes the formation of terrestrial planets by collisions of rocky planet embryos. Here’s what we know so far:

The solar system formed when large bodies collided and separated into planets. This process of collision caused Earth and Venus to form. The smaller planets formed after the collision. Scientists have proposed that a smaller object hit Mercury, vaporizing its crust and leaving it with a larger-than-normal iron core. Afterwards, these rocky planets cooled and formed atmospheres. Although all rocky planets were created at the same time, the later history of each of them varied greatly.

The evolution of rocky planets is complicated, but it can be understood with a little research. One theory postulates that the planets accreted millimeter-sized pebbles from outer space. This would have allowed them to grow quickly, but would not have happened near Mars. Aerodynamic drag is too weak to capture pebbles, so they would not form large planets. That scenario does not account for how Earth’s moons grew.


The formation of rocky planets requires the presence of the elements that make up rocks. Scientists have used spectral energy distributions to understand the formation process. These spectra are an indication of the time scale at which planets form in the solar system. It takes billions of years to form a rocky planet. Scientists have also observed the formation of rocky planets on other stars. This information may be used to understand the formation process on Earth.

When a planet forms, it’s made from material that has cooled to a temperature that allows metals to condense. Carbonaceous meteorites, on the other hand, are not cooled enough to form metals. Carbonaceous meteorites, which are present on Earth, are the first to form on Mars. The remaining materials are more likely to remain gaseous. The inner planets are largely composed of rock and metal, and they form a group known as terrestrial planets.

The composition of Earth’s isotopes suggests that it formed from material in the inner solar system. The formation of Mars and Earth may have followed two fundamentally different processes. While the Earth and Mars formed from collisions between planetary embryos in the inner solar system, the latter is thought to have evolved from millimeter-sized pebbles in the outer solar system. The formation of rocky planets may have been caused by the accretion of carbonaceous meteorites.

Problems with pebble accretion

Pebble accretion on rocky planet models may be flawed because it is too efficient. Pebbles the size of a city would have a good chance of reaching the surface of Earth, but dust the size of marbles would not be able to reach the surface. Also, pebbles may be burned up in the atmosphere and not contribute to the protoplanet’s core.

If this method worked, accretion would account for the formation of planets like Uranus and Neptune. Recent studies using radio telescopes on distant stars have also given planet accretion a boost. One such study was conducted by NASA’s Juno spacecraft, which found Jupiter’s core to be significantly larger than originally expected. This discovery could be related to pebble accretion because it is the only way a planet can grow to such a size over time.

In fact, pebbles accretion on rocky planets is complicated by the fact that the atmosphere on early protoplanets is thin. Pebbles entering the atmosphere contribute a high percentage of their mass to the planet’s growth, but a significant fraction of them also end up raining out and growing the planet’s core. This is an issue that requires further study.

Impact of pebble accretion on rocky planets

The formation of rocky planets involves the accretion of millimeter-sized particles, called pebbles. These particles drift inwards much faster than other sizes, and their supply never runs out. Planetesimals, on the other hand, have a finite amount. So pebble accretion could be a significant factor in the formation of super-Earths.

These ‘pebbles’ are similar to those found inside primitive meteorites. It is not known how pebble accretion affects the mass-orbit distribution of terrestrial planets, but it is one theory for forming the inner solar system. The mass of Venus and Earth, as well as their orbits around Jupiter, are compatible with this theory. The orbit of Mars and Theia is consistent with pebble accretion, but the origin of other planets remains unclear.

The atmosphere of a protoplanet has very little atmosphere, which makes it possible for pebbles to reach the surface easily. The majority of the pebble mass entering the atmosphere contributes to the planet’s growth. However, once the planet has reached 1/3 of Earth’s mass, its atmosphere becomes thick and saturated, and pebbles vaporize. However, this doesn’t mean that a planet’s core can’t grow if it’s hit by a pebble.

Characteristics of rocky planets

A rocky planet has characteristics that make it suitable for life. It is closer to its star than a gas planet, and the temperature is just right for condensing rocks and metals. Gaseous planets, on the other hand, form at far lower temperatures, which makes them less suitable for life. In this way, both rocky and gaseous planets have dense atmospheres. Depending on the planetary composition, they can have different characteristics, ranging from small, rocky bodies to large, gaseous ones.

Rocky planets differ in size and mass. Some are smaller than Earth, while others are much larger. According to NASA, a rocky planet must have a diameter of 125 percent or less than Earth’s. It must also have a mass of less than 1.4 times Earth’s mass, and an orbital distance of no more than two astronomical units from its host star. Currently, astronomers have detected 409 extrasolar rocky planets.

In general, rocky planets orbit their host stars at a larger distance than other stars. In fact, Mercury, Venus, and Earth orbit their stars at a distance of 0.387 astronomical units, while Mars and Kepler-367-c orbit their star at just 0.02 AU. Those three planets have dense atmospheres, but their masses are lower than Earth’s. This is a result of the Sun’s massive gravitational field.